BBC edits Larry Silverstein pull it wtc7 lies kerry controlled fashion wtc 7

Unlocking_Freedom
Published on Aug 9, 2020
A compilation of "inaccuracies" in the official and media representation of the world trade center 7 wtc 7 collapse, includes the bbc's careful editing of larry silversteins comments, the actual facts, john kerry's bizarre answer relating to wtc7's collapse, + george bush's words of wisdom to the international community - can also apply to the comments of mainstream media in general

(height/distance) d = 174m
(time for collapse) t = 6.5s
d = Va X t (Va is Average Velocity)
Va = d / t
Va = 174 / 6.5
Va=26.7
V1 (intitial velocity) = 0
Va = Vf+V1 / 2 (Vf is final velocity)
Va X 2 = Vf+V1
26.7 X 2 = Vf+0
Vf = 53.5
^V (change in velocity) = Vf-V1
^V = 53.5 - 0
^V = 53.5m/s
^V = a X t
53.5 = a x 6.5s
a = 53.5/6.5

a = 8.2 m/s/s for wtc building 7

"a" in a vacuum at freefall with zero resistance is 9.8m/s/s
"a" at freefall with air resistance is noticably lower.

which would imply that the lower floors disappeared as the upper floors descended.
The 40,000 tonnes of structural steel reinforced with concrete and heavy duty bolts were designed to withstand
earthquakes and tornados
and stand for over 100 years while supporting the weight of the upper floors + more
how can 47 floors of heavy duty structure holding bolts snap simultaneously due to fire
why did all the structural steel reinforced with concrete pulverize into dust or resist less than thin air due to isolated pockets of open air fire - when no plane hit it ??????

Category

Share Video

  • 560 x 315
  • 640 x 360
  • 853 x 480
  • 1280 x 720

Add to

Flag Video

Rate video

Rate video

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.