Collusion and Malfeasance: What's the Chance That All Four Companies Would Pick the Spike Protein?

JungleEaglesNest
Published on Jun 6, 2022
Collusion and Malfeasance: What's the Chance That All Four Companies Would Pick the Spike Protein?
Suboptimal Vaccine Design at Every Level
- When developing a vaccine, you would normally pick a part of the organism that is not intrinsically harmful; they picked the most dangerous portion.
- Next, you would pick a part of the organism that is genetically most stable. Well, they picked the bit that apparently mutates most quickly.
- You must also try and pick a part of the organism that's most different from you so that when you elicit an immune response, it won't overlap and hit you. However, the spike protein was the least dissimilar option they had.
Dr. Mike Yeadon: (http://t.me/robinmg) "Well, so what do you make of all four companies doing the same thing [and picking the suboptimal choice]? There's a long delay, and they [peers in the industry] said, 'They must have designed to do it together.' So I think collusion and malfeasance is evident there."

Add to

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Flag Video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.