JOSEPH GOEBBELS ON COMMUNISM - BOLSHEVISM AND THE CRIMINAL MADNESS INVENTED BY JEWS AND LED BY JEWS

Rindfleisch
Published on Oct 31, 2021
m: https://www.bitchute.com/video/pfNhV9d5wUaf/
Joseph Goebbels on Communism
"What we usually understand by idea and worldview (Weltanschauung) in general, has nothing to do with what is called Bolshevism. It concerns a pathological criminal madness invented by the Jews and led by the Jews, with the aim of destroying the civilized European people, while they establish an international Jewish world domination over them."
Background: This speech was delivered to the annual congress of the Nazi Party on 13 September 1935. Goebbels was rather proud of the effort. He wrote in his diary on 15 September: â€œA brilliant success. The FÃ¼hrer was genuinely enthused. A storm of applause, My material was deeply moving.â€
In the beginning of August, this year, one of the most authoritative English newspapers published a leading article entitled â€œTwo Dictatorshipsâ€, in which a naive and misdirected attempt was made to place before the readers of the paper certain alleged similarities between Russian Bolshevism and German National Socialism. This article gave rise to an extraordinary amount of heated discussion in international centres, which was only another proof of the fact that an astonishing misconception exists among the most prominent West European circles as to the danger which communism presents to the life of the individual and of the nation. Such people still cling to their opinion in face of the terrible and devastating experiences of the past eighteen years in Russia.
The author of the article stated that the two symbols which are to-day opposed to one another, namely that of Bolshevism and National Socialism, stand for regimes which â€œin essential structure are similar and in many of their laws-their buttresses-are identical. The similarity is moreover increasing.â€ He went on to say:
â€œIn both countries are the same censorships on art, literature, and of course the Press, the same war on the intelligentsia, the attack on religion, and the massed display of arms, whether in the Red Square or the Tempelhofer Feld.â€
â€œThe strange and terrible thing isâ€, he declared, â€œthat two nations, once so widely different, should have been schooled and driven into patterns so drably similar.â€
One sees here much verbiage and little understanding. The anonymous writer of this article has obviously not studied the essential and fundamental principles either of National Socialism or Bolshevism. He considers merely certain superficial phenomena and he has not taken cognisance of what serious journalists have had to say on the matter in question or compared his views with their objective statements. This entirely erroneous judgment of the case might be passed over with a shrug of the shoulders and considered merely as part of the daily order of things, were it not for the fact that the two problems here discussed belong in their essentials to political phenomena which are important for the future of Europe. Moreover this strikingly cursory judgment on the problem is not merely a single case but has to be taken in conjunction with a much wider and more influential section of West European opinion.
In contradistinction to this, I shall try here to analyse Bolshevism into its basic elements and show these as clearly as I can to the German and European public. This is not an easy task, in view of the fact that the Propagandist Institutions of the Communist International are undoubtedly well organised and have not been unsuccessful in putting before the public of the world, outside of the Russian frontiers, an entirely false picture of Bolshevism. This picture is an extraordinarily dangerous one because of the tension which it can and must naturally cause. Let us also note the profound hatred in liberal circles throughout the world in regard to National Socialism and its practical constructive work in Germany. Hence the possibility here also of mistaken judgments, such as these already mentioned. They pass by what is essential. International communism would entirely do away with all national and racial qualities which are founded in human nature itself; in property it sees the most primary cause of the break-down of world trade in the capitalist system. Accordingly it exploits this through an extensive and carefully organised and brutal system of action, setting aside personal values and sacrificing the individual to a hollow mass-idol that is only a travesty of actual life itself. At the same time it ignores and destroys all the idealistic and higher strivings of men and nations, through its own crass and empty materialist principles. On the other hand, National Socialism sees in all these thingsâ€”in property, in personal values and in nation and race and the principles of idealismâ€”these forces which carry on every human civilisation and fundamentally determine its worth.
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb58.htm