Jim and Diane, WALK AND TALK, Jan 21, 2024, Degrelle’s Pope Ltr; Weber’s Quitting ‘Shoah” Fighting

Holotruther
Published on Jan 22, 2024
*** Leon Degrelle’s Letter to Pope John Paul II, About Auschwitz (circa 1979)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3xpZf4MTHJMV/
*** Mark Weber
*** How Relevant is Holocaust Revisionism, Jan 7, 2009
https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n1p-2_Faurisson.html
*** Follow Up (Feb 13, 2009): A Reply to Critics of My Essay on the Relevance of Holocaust Revisionism By Mark Weber Director, Institute for Historical Review
February 13, 2009
JEWISH INDEPENDENT (FORWARD)
Revisionist: It’s Time To Quit Shoah Fight by Nathaniel Popper January 16, 2009
https://forward.com/news/14953/revisionist-it-s-time-to-quit-shoah-fight-03176/
One of the primary leaders in the fight to question and delegitimize the Holocaust has proclaimed that fight to be a lost cause, sparking a furious debate among his cohorts. Mark Weber, a telegenic Californian, has served for 15 years as director of the Institute for Historical Review, which was founded in the late 1970s as a center for people dedicated to doubting and criticizing mainstream histories of the Holocaust. This month, however, Weber released an essay on the institute’s Web site, questioning whether this work has ever had any relevance. Weber argued that Holocaust revisionists are unlikely to have any success in convincing large numbers of people. “It’s been almost 30 years, and Holocaust revisionism has gotten almost no support in academic circles or society at large,” Weber told the Forward. “It’s gotten some support in Iran, or places like that, but as far as I know, there is no history department supporting writing by these folks.” The argument in Weber’s essay, “How Relevant Is Holocaust Revisionism?” might appear, at first glance, to be good news for the Jewish organizations that have fought against Holocaust revisionists. But in his essay, Weber calls for his movement to shift to a new mission, one more purely directed to fighting against “Jewish-Zionist power.”
*** From The Journal of Historical Review, January/February 2000 (Vol. 19, No. 1), pages 2-31. Impact and Future of Holocaust Revisionism by Robert Faurisson
https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n1p-2_Faurisson.html
Robert Faurisson is Europe's foremost Holocaust revisionist scholar. Born in 1929, he was educated at the Paris Sorbonne, and served as a professor at the University of Lyon in France from 1974 until 1990. He was a specialist of text and document analysis. After years of private research and study, Dr. Faurisson first made public his skeptical views about the Holocaust extermination story in articles published in 1978 and 1979 in the French daily Le Monde. His writings on the Holocaust issue have appeared in several books and numerous scholarly articles, many of which have been published in this Journal. This essay, translated from the French by S. Mundi, is adapted from the introduction (dated December 3, 1998) to Écrits révisionnistes (1974-1998), a four-volume collection, published in 1999, of many of Faurisson's revisionist writings.

Add to

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Flag Video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.