Angela Davis and the American Ruling Class - Matt Raphael Johnson

Defender88
Published on May 22, 2021
Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson contrasts the treatment of alleged right wing terrorists, with undisputed left wing ones, with specific case studies referring to jαмεs ƒιεℓδs and Angela Davis.

The USA has a strange history with the concept of “terrorism.” It is well known that right wing activists are sent to prison without evidence against them, while the Left are given money and fame regardless of the evidence against them. The far Left on the street is an arm of the oligarchy and isn't generally prosecuted for crimes relative to their high number. Their opposition, on the other hand, is at war with the oligarchy, so crimes are often invented.

Even a cursory look at the case against j4m35 f13ld5, just to provide one example, shows endless reasonable doubt and proves that the whole case was a farce. The ⒶⒹⓁ, in a press release, mentions that they were coaching law enforcement before, during and after the event in Virginia

Angela Davis ran guns for the group that shot up a courthouse in Marin County in 1970-1971 which left four men dead, including the judge. She was acquitted of all charges despite overwhelming evidence. As a result, she's a celebrated name in academia today and a former “professor” at UCLA despite having no academic ability at all. Her criminal past and open advocacy for murder doesn't harm her career, it helps her.

From Davis, to Attica to Mumia al-Jamal, Leftist terrorism is defended by the ruling class and its perpetrators given millions of dollars, book deals and social respectability.

Share Video

  • 560 x 315
  • 640 x 360
  • 853 x 480
  • 1280 x 720

Add to

Flag Video

Rate video

Rate video

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.

Up next
Autoplay