MEMORY HOLED FOOTAGE OF CNN REPORTING ON A SEPTEMBER 11 HIJACKER ₪ HAVING AN ISRAELI ACCENT

Sama_El
Published on Sep 10, 2024
The events of September 11, 2001 are still occurring - the cover-up is always bigger than the crime

VfB told you that he figured out the whole scam at 10:00 AM that morning, as the first of three buildings disintegrated

Benjamin Mileikowsky, Larry 'Two Sheds' Silverstein and Jerome Hauer gave up the information just prior to VfB coming to that understanding...it was a couple of years later that WHO KILLED JOHN O'NEILL was posted...that was convincing enough until Allan Weisbecker's essay appeared, and then it hit like a missile - if John O'Neill WAS legit, SEPTEMBER 11th NEVER WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO OCCUR

Once you realize that, you will realize just how many mistakes were made

Orwells Optimism: The Deep State, Self-Deception, 9/11, and the Legend of "FBI Maverick" John O'Neill

http://www.banditobooks.com/essay/content/1.php

Just an excerpt:

In the summer of 2007 screenwriter ('The Siege')/book writer Lawrence Wright did an in depth interview on C-Span's Book TV. Wright is the author of The Looming Tower; Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11, which won the Pulitzer Prize for Nonfiction (2007). As I watched the interview—and as a student of the events of 9/11 -- I quickly sensed that Wright's book is a rehash of the 9/11 Commission's 'official story' about the attacks, i.e., a complete crock of shit.

Although a later reading of the book confirmed this, as my TV examination of Lawrence Wright progressed, so grew a sense of outrage. See, as a nonfiction book writer myself, and (in 2007) having not yet perceived the direct correlation between deep state propaganda and prestigious literary prizes, I fantasized that winning the Pulitzer Prize for Nonfiction implied that a nonfiction book, at the very least, would not be a complete crock of shit. I mean, that doesn't seem to ask too much of the Pulitzer Committee.

Although a detailed analysis of Wright's deceptions is not for this purview, some instructive examples may lead us to insights germane to the issues under scrutiny.

When his Book TV interviewer inquired why he did not deal except in passing with the '9/11 hijackers,' Wright squirmed and hemmed and hawed, then blurted the following crapola:

'I..I..I didn't feel drawn to them as a writer.'

Wright squirmed some more, hemmed, then hawed this:

'On some level I wasn't interested in them.'

Mmmmm... Perhaps had Mr. Wright been drawn to the hijackers as a writer, or been interested in them, he'd have had to mention that, according to the BBC and other sources (including the Saudi embassy), a slew of them were very much alive on 9/12/01.

Source: https://x.com/a_westgate/status/1832946044176376268

Thumbnail: https://www.banditobooks.com/essay/images/larry_siliverstein_smiling.jpg