WERE WE JUST WITNESS TO A SECOND STAND-DOWN BY THE SECRET SERVICE❓[JFK REDUX]

Sama_El
Published on Jul 14, 2024
J6 Videos - 42 SECONDS .@SpeakerJohnson @elonmusk The "counter snipers" didn't take the shot at the shooter sniper They were looking at him at least 42 seconds before the ear shot on Donald Trump and failed the President Did The CIA do an inside job with Thomas Matthew Crooks w/ the AR-15

Source: https://x.com/J6Videos/status/1812398609108705643

Looking at the map.
Do you think there was line of sight issues with the shooters particular location.
I saw the sniper do a quick tripod adjustment to elevate it.
Also there's a treeline that affects the snipers, but not the shooter.

Thumbnail: https://x.com/blkferret/status/1812438563398557894

VfB has yet to see this building identified, and why it wasn't properly covered by the Secret Service [shades of November 22, 1963, which reeks of a psyop within a psyop, since we now know that the Zapruder Film was a project]

They had guns in the shooters direction
The let him crawl onto the roof.
They let him get his rifle out.
They ignored other people screaming about the gun man
They let shots get fired
They killed him once Trump was down…
This was an inside job

https://x.com/nick2times/status/1812434553564168255

Add to

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Flag Video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.