HENRY?FORD WAS TAKEN OUT BY THE (((HBM))) SO THAT THE #TRANSAPOCALYPTICO WENT AS PLANNED

Sama_El
Published on Jul 17, 2023
a fucking psychotic marrano murderer

Right after I got off with muh dawgs, I went to post the morning's fare...and look at what these freaks were peeking at with (((great curiosity))), goyimzes...frum muh (((clipboard))) :

Search The Abode

Invite others!
Chat is more fun with friends.
https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/prism/prism_9-1/prism_9-1.pdf
https://twitter.com/DrTedros/status/1677411912542220288?s=20
We just won
https://www.bitchute.com/video/D9Xaf0E2GMQh/
https://dailycaller.com/2023/07/15/chris-wray-gun-control-fbi-hearing
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9gj9Hzt1BHzW/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Originalism
https://granitegrok.com/mg_seacoast/2023/07/free-nh-charter-school-provides-customized-education-with-complete-flexibility
Here's another quote I came up with
Always be on guard against everything the ''negative value tribe'' do and do not do.
Never make a deal - they will break it
est
taxes aren't real, so death and jews cheat are the only universal constants
Still, how does my quote sound?
(((The idea that judicial review was distinguished from ordinary political process by the application of principles grew to be understood as fundamental to the legitimacy of judicial interpretation)))
obv VfB approves; instead, how about you isolate the yid terminolgy in this sentence
this is a trick question
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KEgwSf6QqKbQ/
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Originalism&diff=1161746697&oldid=439602566
Revision as of 11:08, 15 July 2011 (edit)
Wingman4l7 (talk | contribs)
m (removed extra comma)
← Previous edit
(498 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
{{essay|date=January 2011}}
[[File:Scene at the Signing of the Constitution of the United States.png|250px|thumb|right|''[[Scene at the Signing of the Constitution of the United States]]'', by [[Howard Chandler Christy]].]]
In the context of [[United States]] [[constitutional interpretation]], '''originalism''' is a principle of interpretation that tries to discover the original meaning or intent of the [[constitution]]and not impose new interpretations foreign to t he original intention of the authors. It extols the virtues of [[judicial fundamentalism]]. It is based on the [[Separation of powers|principle]] that the [[Judicial branch|judiciary]] is not supposed to create, amend or repeal laws (which is the realm of the [[Legislature|legislative branch]]) but only to uphold them. The term is a [[neologism]],{{fact|date=May 2011}} and the concept is a [[Legal formalism|formalist]] theory of law and a [[corollary]] of [[textualism]].
In the context of United States law, originalism is a theory of constitutional interpretation that asserts that all statements in the Constitution must be interpreted based on the original understanding.[1] This concept views the Constitution as stable from the time of enactment and that the meaning of its contents can be changed only by the steps set out in Article Five.[2] This notion stands in contrast to

oop - VfB solved the (((jq)))

And THIS is why one is instructed to 'check your work'; it's for YOU

Add to

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Flag Video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.