WATSON'S MAGAZINE, SEPTEMBER 1915, PART 5 OF 13, LEO FRANK CASE BY U.S. SENATOR TOM WATSON

leomaxfrank
Published on Dec 14, 2022
Tom Watson was a House of Representatives member (1896) and United States Senator (1920) from Georgia, who was regarded as one of the most brilliant criminal defense attorneys of his time.
Although he uses vitriolic language when speaking about Hebrew people, he had defended Jewish people in the past. He believes in Leo's guilt and is appalled by the powers that supported him. He was a radical populist who championed poor African-American and European-American farmers. In 1913, he was offered a $5000 retainer (which is about $150,000 in today's dollars) to defend Leo Frank but he refused, and the following year (1914) ,after Leo Frank was convicted, he wrote about the case in his Jeffersonian weekly newspaper. In 1915, he wrote five magazine articles on the trial and appeals in his Watson's Magazine, January, March, August, September and October issues. We present here an audiobook segment (PART FIVE) of that September 1915 article, transformed into a montage.

Share Video

  • 560 x 315
  • 640 x 360
  • 853 x 480
  • 1280 x 720

Add to

Flag Video

Rate video

Rate video

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.

Up next
Autoplay